Character pages Edit
Hi there. Regarding the quests, I see you point. I wont add the war table operations then. Regarding Trespasser, kinda. My reasoning for adding it? Many others have done so on many other pages. And that haven't been reverted.
Regarding another user and my edits (user 126.96.36.199). S/he has been reverting some of my other edits - unaffiliated with what you have reverted. They simple provided a small bit of additional info (look at Cullen's, Blackwall's and Shale's pages). Dajax02 (talk) 18:14, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough! I hadn't noticed Trespasser being added on other pages - I understand wanting to be consistent. Personally I would still remove it for the reasons I gave on your talk page; let me know what you think.
- I've left a note on the anon's talk page inviting them to discuss things here, so it's all in one place. For the anon's info, here's what I posted on Dajax02's talk page:
- The ones I've reverted have mainly been where war table operations or non-companion quests have been listed as quests, or where Trespasser has been listed under appearances where Dragon Age: Inquisition is already included. I've done this because DLC for a particular game form part of the main game; basically you can't play Trespasser without already owning DAI, thus it's not separate from DAI and doesn't need its own listing. I've amended the "quests" section to only include quests directly related to that character as a companion because if we listed every quest where a character is tangentially related or made an appearance then we'd list every single quest in every game they're in, which would just be silly.
- 18:28, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
It's mostly based around all of it, such as Cullen for example. Listing The Inquisitor as his wife even if conditional shouldn't be listed, considering how I've seen on other pages such as Kieran his father isn't mentioned because of the player determined outcome of it, a similar thing is with Cullen, the quests (from what I know) are only for personal quests and not for quests said person was involved in. Affiliations are something I'm not a fan of, considering affiliations really refer to a group and not a person or country. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 18:56, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
- I began doing it for two reasons: 1) I like that, in need of a better term, seems "complete" 2) The consistency that Mag mentioned. It's true, Kieran doesn't have his father named (he did though sometime ago though) but many other characters also has this kind of information (not added by me).
- Really, it's just a small amount of additional info - it doesn't hurt anyone.
- Regarding Trespasser: if you don't mind Mag (and if you don't revert it ofc) I might - might - add it here and there. Not really like its a major thing.
- And [number guy]: that affiliations doesn't refer to a person or country is, to my knowledge, downright untrue. Dajax02 (talk) 20:17, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
- I agree about the importance of consistency, but I'm concerned that the character infoboxes could become very bloated very quickly if we try to include all possibilities. There's a huge number, after all!
- So far it looks like we have three issues to resolve (feel free to add any others you want to discuss):
- Whether romantic relationships should be listed under family
- Whether DLC should be listed under appearances
- Whether people and countries should be listed under affiliation
- My view is that romantic relationships shouldn't be included under family at all, except where a marriage is an immutable part of Bioware canon, e.g. Rowan being listed as King Maric's wife vs. Anora listed as Alistair's sister-in-law.
- I agree with Henioo's point about Trespasser/DLC. Doing it this way helps cut down on bloating in articles, too.
- I'm not sure about affiliations. My understanding is that affiliations to a country technically means affiliation with that country's government, not the land mass, and affiliations to a person means a formalised alliance and/or business arrangement, thus excluding personal relationships. If you guys agree with that, then I'd say we could list affiliations with a person (so long as it's not a purely personal relationship), but not places, since place-based articles on this wiki are about the physical locations and not any groups/organisations within them.
- Thoughts? 20:59, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
If I may interject on a few points:
- The affiliation section should be reserved for affiliations to organizations, not races or countries, or other superfluous categories.
- Quest sections in the infobox should only include companion quests or quests that are specifically about the character. For instance, although Finding Nathaniel isn't a companion quest, it is a quest specifically about him and no one else, therefore it's listed.
- "Conditional" is absolutely allowed. I have no idea where the notion came from that it isn't. It's even listed in our manual of style Dragon Age Wiki:Manual of Style#Infobox. I don't see a problem with listing potential spouses as family members.
- Family sections are reserved only for immediate family--no second cousins, girlfriends, great-aunts, etc.
- As Henio0 states above, DLC should only be listed in appearances if the character only appears in the DLC and not the main game--such as Teagan Guerrin
- Instead of just blanket undoing an edit, one should first examine whether anything within the guidelines was added. Don't just hit the "undo" button, explore the edit and consider a partial undo.
There are definitely articles that have things on them that they should not, so the fact that something is on a page doesn't always mean that it should be added to every other page. I'd invite any contributors to look over our Dragon Age Wiki:Manual of Style. ♫ Kelcat Talk 21:07, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
- That's really helpful, thank you! I tried looking in the editing guidelines, not the manual of style, so it's no wonder I didn't find anything. :) 21:23, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
So what is the final judgement guys? If we take my edits: which of them are we including? And what reverts are we keeping? Can we agree on something like this:
- Cullen: Only Inquisition and Templar Order listed under affiliations. The Inquisitor can be listed as a conditional wife. Only the three personal Inquisition quests - none of those from either Origins or DA2.
- Blackwall: Grey Wardens, Inquisition and Orlesian army listed under affiliations (the army as he was a soldier - not the nation as he has no relation to it in the larger whole. Same thing with Markham). Grey Warden, Warden-Constable and Captain listed under titles.
- Shale: Only The Warden and House Cadash listed under affiliations (not Orzammar as she was a warrior and not related to the government itself).
- Alistair: The Grey Wardens and Ferelden (if he is king (and canonically)), The Warden and Templar Order (as he was once a Templar (initiate but regardless)) listed under affiliations. The Warden (and Anora) listed as a conditional wife. His family quest from Origins, the King Alistair quest from DA2 and (potientially?) Here Lies the Abyss from DA:I listed under quests.
And the conclusion regarding DLCs such as Trespasser? (My thoughts about adding DLCs to their appearences is if there are interactions with them exclusive to that DLC (such as with the Inner Circle characters in Trespasser)). Dajax02 (talk) 22:06, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
- We've had a mod response from Kelcat clarifying the rules that were already in place, so I didn't reply because there's no further consensus to be reached. The only things I'd point out in your previous post are that Ferelden is a country and the Warden is a person therefore neither are valid affiliations, main quests are never solely about one character and so don't come under quests, and (again) DLCs should not be listed unless the character in question only appears in that DLC and not the main game (e.g. the Viddasala). Everything else looks okay. Hopefully that makes sense! 19:57, February 4, 2016 (UTC)