This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michel Lafaille article. |
---|
|
Given how little information we have, i am unsure this warrants a separate article. The little we do know could easily be subsumed into other articles without losing any information. Thoughts? - HD3 (talk) 15:37, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
- I think it has enough content. – mostlyautumn • talk • contribs • 16:26, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
- To be fair, you did expand the article after i wrote the original topic. In light of the exansion however, i think it's probably large enough now to warrant remaining a separate article.-HD3 (talk) 02:50, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
- The article certainly is a stub, but last I knew, stubs still belonged as separate articles, even if just on the principle that more information may come to light later to be collected.