Delete nomination

While the tabletop RPG contains canonical information on lore, this one is a special case. More specifically, in the Game Master's Guide it provides the GM with some custom adventures to send the players in instead of requiring the GM to create one on their own.

Subsequently this cannot be a considered a reliable source of canon information so I am nominating it for deletion. Viktoria Landers 08:31, August 17, 2019 (UTC)

I fail to see how this differentiates it from any of the bioware canon material. Or indeed any possible dlc. Why should we delete an npc article based on an npc in bioware sanctioned material rather than sticking a bioware canon tag on it?

-Seekers of Truth heraldryHD3 (Talk) 04:25, August 18, 2019 (UTC)

The tabletop's materials are divided into several parts such as the Player's Guide, Monsters' Guide, Dungeon Master's Guide (players are not allowed to read that one). This specific part is in the very end of the DM's guide and is called "Adventures" and offers to a DM insights on how to set up their own background and story for their team and then provides them with some sample stories-adventures.
Here is a disclaimer on one of these adventures which points out an inconsistency but explains why it is imperative to be this way so that the story-adventure make sense and not fall into logical fallacies. Viktoria Landers 09:55, August 18, 2019 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.