| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knight-Vigilant article. |
|---|
|
I really don't think there's enough information here to warrant a separate article. A lot of it is already covered on the Templar Order article already. I think we could easily take the small amount of unique material and append it as a footnote or similar to the templar order article.
-
21:21, March 1, 2015 (UTC)
- I think if we had more sources, and knew the actual names of some of the Knight-Vigilants (Knights-Vigilant?) I could see this warranting its own article, especially since it's the highest rank in the Order, but I have to agree that as it stands, it's better to just merge it with the Templar Order article. --♫ Kelcat Talk 01:34, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
- I'm going to have to agree, there really isn't any information known besides the rank's name. The article should be removed for know, and recreated if any new information on the subject is released.--Swampshade (talk) 07:49, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
- In similar situation is First Warden. Nobody knows what name any of them had and they are just mentioned. In Awakening expansion, Dragon Age II and the Last flight his actions are all off screen. At least in Dragon Age Inquisition we can see Knight-Vigilant's body.Andrzej.lewinski.351 (talk) 13:36, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
Now we have a name of knight-vigilant found in Theirnfal, Trentwatch.Andrzej.lewinski.351 (talk) 09:42, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
- We have a single name, with very little known about him, whose main involvement is being dead. We still don't have enough concrete background information, illustrated by the fact that the first sentence describing the position includes "not fully defined" and "can be inferred". --♫ Kelcat Talk 00:21, March 10, 2015 (UTC)