Talk: Gauntlets of the Sentinel

Revision as of 13:04, 13 February 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gauntlets of the Sentinel article.
General discussions not pertaining to the improvement of the article should be held in Discussions instead. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes! (`~~~~`) Do not edit another editor's comment.

What model did the Gauntlets use? Graf Gaius (talk) 19:10, November 10, 2014 (UTC)

The 'two boot bug' (or not)

Regarding the reported bug of 'two pairs of boots, rather than the gauntlets and boots', I don't see how that is possible. An examination of the UTP files for the three containers shows that the Sentinel armour pieces are not random drops, they are specifically added to those chests (stb100ip_reward_chest_01.utp = helm; stb100ip_reward_chest_02.utp = gauntlets; stb100ip_reward_chest_03.utp = boots, with the chestpiece being found on the First's corpse). Now, it MAY be possible to obtain second pair of boots as a random drop, from one of the Avvar Lords fought in 'The Wraith's Vengence', as all three are equipped with the Boots of the Sentinel, but that could not affect the gauntlets being 'hard coded' into the Blackmarsh chest.

I would suggest that the 'bug' is not actually a bug, but rather, a misunderstanding resulting from a combination of a missed chest and a coincidental random drop. - Theskymoves (talk) 13:55, February 12, 2017 (UTC)

That's why I added {{Confirm}}.

--CompleCCity (talk) 08:50, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

and your 'confirm' is why I added the explanation. I think I should probably stop trying to contribute to the wiki, since my attempts seem to be more annoying to the 'elite editors' than of any value. Sorry for the waste of time. - Theskymoves (talk) 13:04, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:50, 13 February 2017 (edit) CompleCCity (talk \| contribs) (→‎The 'two boot bug' (or not): reply) Tag: sourceedit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:04, 13 February 2017 (edit) (undo) Theskymoves (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: sourceedit Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:That's why I added {{Tl\|Confirm}}. {{;)}} --[[User:CompleCCity\|CompleCCity]] ([[User talk:CompleCCity\|talk]]) 08:50, February 13, 2017 (UTC)		:That's why I added {{Tl\|Confirm}}. {{;)}} --[[User:CompleCCity\|CompleCCity]] ([[User talk:CompleCCity\|talk]]) 08:50, February 13, 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	:: and your 'confirm' is why I added the explanation. I think I should probably stop trying to contribute to the wiki, since my attempts seem to be more annoying to the 'elite editors' than of any value. Sorry for the waste of time. - [[User:Theskymoves\|Theskymoves]] ([[User talk:Theskymoves\|talk]]) 13:04, February 13, 2017 (UTC)