Talk: Cute Nug

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cute Nug article.
General discussions not pertaining to the improvement of the article should be held in Discussions instead. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes! (~~~~) Do not edit another editor's comment.

Approval rating vs nug

I had a trigger for this with a rating around 30 and no romance involved. So maybe we need to check this again... Auriaya 02:08, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

On the PC you need 80 or better approval, I checked it three seperate times. 66.190.144.239 12:12, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

I play on the PC version and checked yesterday after posting here... got the cutscene at 22 approval (neutral). Maybe they changed in a patch or something? Auriaya 17:45, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

I got it at +12 approval (neutral). I just talked to her before entering the Deep Roads to search for Branka. 129.177.44.116 20:51, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

I think that one of the requirements for initiating the conversation, is that Leliana has to be hardened before there is even a possibility to talk about nugs in Orzammar.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakota tobiano (talk • contribs) 02:33, September 4, 2011

tested on PC version 1.05, Leliana gave the conversation at +63 approval, romance inactive, personal quest not started, could order the nug immediately at the idle dwarf. Looks like the requirements that are on the page are wrong, perhaps the problems some users had were caused by too much open dialog (as stated on the page)?--Schrödingercat (talk) 23:09, July 27, 2014 (UTC)

Split Page?

This page regards the "cute nug" gift for Leliana. However, the nug's name is noted on the page and in game as "Schmooples." Is it possible/desirable to rename this page, or else break it up in some meaningful way?--WardenWade (talk) 16:46, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

To add to this, Kitten and Ser Pounce-a-lot have separate pages, so this seems to me like it might be a good idea. Any preferences either way?--WardenWade (talk) 00:25, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

I agree that it should be split; they're essentially two separate things. --Kelcat (talk) 01:42, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Kelcat! Barring any serious downvotes for the idea in the interim I'll make the change.--WardenWade (talk) 03:53, April 2, 2014 (UTC)