Dragon Age Wiki
Dragon Age Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
   
 
i belive that both sides are wrong. Yes Templars are mostly oppressors. Yes some mages are evil especially the blood ones but pointless war between mages and templars threatning normal people. on second thought: iam not suprise that people are siding with Templars. Just remember what Anders did. This is deffinitly didn't show mages in their best light. - Darthportus
 
i belive that both sides are wrong. Yes Templars are mostly oppressors. Yes some mages are evil especially the blood ones but pointless war between mages and templars threatning normal people. on second thought: iam not suprise that people are siding with Templars. Just remember what Anders did. This is deffinitly didn't show mages in their best light. - Darthportus
  +
  +
Personally I'm inclined to support the mages. In-game? Well, it's an RPG, it depends on how I decide to roleplay the new protagonist and how Bioware represents both sides. [[User:Kestrella|Kestrella]] ([[User talk:Kestrella|talk]]) 12:23, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:23, 20 July 2012

Forums: Index > Game DiscussionIn DAIII, Are you gonna join Templars or Mages
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4291 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not continue it unless it really needs a response.

In this war, the upcoming one. Everyone will see blood at the grounds. This war is bigger than world wars... manny sacrifices, low heroes or manny heroes..

Which side do you gonna join? Both sides have its own pros and contras, so where you belong? Are you joining 100% Templars? Are you joining 100% Mages? Or Are you joining 50% Templars? Or Are you joining 50% Mages? Or just defend who is right: Defend Templars against lost mind Mages and defend Mages against Bad Templars?


I go definately with joining 100% with Templars.--MEVLUT COUSLAND (talk) 20 July 2012, 08:13 (UTC)

I was all for mages untill that jerk killed my mom D: Now me and Sebastian and Fenris are going on a pscho mage killing spree GarettTheBoy (talk) 06:33, July 20, 2012 (UTC) -->GarettTheBoy

mwahahahhahah yeah that mage made me sick too.. but the first ever necromancer in dragon age... hope we see them more often in dragon age to hunt them down .--MEVLUT COUSLAND (talk) 20 July 2012, 08:41 (UTC)

In DA2 my Hawke was a mage sympathiser until Quentin appeared and destroyed his life. Since then he become less trusting towards mages. He supported templars since Grace, Thrask, Keran and Alain he helped betrayed him. He helped templars in the Last Straw, because he suspected O in Qunetin's letter is Orsino. Anders' action definitelly made him hate him and he executed this abomination. Of course he never let Meredith kill his beloved sister, Bethany. Mage supporter became a templar supporter in short. In DA3 I'd support none of the sides, because I see both as bloody murderers and warmongers, who can't live in peace. I think if any of the sides wins, there will be no good. I don't want another Imperium of despotic blood mages or paranoidal templars' dictatorship. BOth sides know only hatred and war, they cannot live in peace. I want destruction of both sides to end this war with no victor. I see none of them is good, both sides are guilty. I don't support idea based on hatred, I care only about civillians, who suffer the most in every war. When war lasts long civillians begin to not care who started this war, who's right or wrong, they just want end of the war. In short I support none of the sides. Template:Unsigned User 78.8.128.148


I'm totally with the mages! I am shocked at how many Templar sympathisers there are! People are so quick to condemm the mages in DAII and I think that's because we don't get to see the circle at all really. These mages were all rebelling against oppressors for a reason. I think DAII gave a really biased view of the prelude to the conflict. Meredith was insane! In DA my Warden was a mage and was a templar sympathiser to maintain order. My Hawke was also a mage but I feel less sympathetic of the templars in DAII because of how they were all corrupt (not necessarily in a bad way i.e. Thrask, but still not dedicated) or insane (Meredith!). In DAIII I will side with the mages or (and I'm hoping this will be an option because I feel it lacked in DAII) I will side with the chantry and restore order by heavily punishing the templars and mages alike, permitting mages to leave the cities and train in their own areas, much like the dalish and still allowing a circle to be exist but as a voluntary obligation. The templars duties then will be to maintain in-city order and hunt down rogue mages but with less authority and fewer numbers than before. Assassin for the argonauts (talk) 10:09, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

i belive that both sides are wrong. Yes Templars are mostly oppressors. Yes some mages are evil especially the blood ones but pointless war between mages and templars threatning normal people. on second thought: iam not suprise that people are siding with Templars. Just remember what Anders did. This is deffinitly didn't show mages in their best light. - Darthportus

Personally I'm inclined to support the mages. In-game? Well, it's an RPG, it depends on how I decide to roleplay the new protagonist and how Bioware represents both sides. Kestrella (talk) 12:23, July 20, 2012 (UTC)