No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
No it's not. New entries are inserted in the alphabetical order, so it will be 1,2,3,4,5,6 and then 1,2 new,3(ex2),4(ex3),5 new,6(ex4),7(ex5),8 new,9(ex 6) etc. [[User:Asherinka|Asherinka]] ([[User talk:Asherinka|talk]]) 02:48, April 11, 2015 (UTC) |
No it's not. New entries are inserted in the alphabetical order, so it will be 1,2,3,4,5,6 and then 1,2 new,3(ex2),4(ex3),5 new,6(ex4),7(ex5),8 new,9(ex 6) etc. [[User:Asherinka|Asherinka]] ([[User talk:Asherinka|talk]]) 02:48, April 11, 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | UPD One more question. There are a lot of DAI texts that are not included in the Codex. I recently added all landmark descriptions (like [[Landmarks_in_the_Emprise#Descriptions|this]]). However some are not even landmarks (like [[Codex entry: The Claws of Dumat|this]]). What should we do with such items? [[User:Asherinka|Asherinka]] ([[User talk:Asherinka|talk]]) 07:49, April 11, 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 07:49, 11 April 2015
The DLC Changes Codex numbering - new entries are inserted rather than added to the end. For instance, see Codex: History. "A Chant for the Departed" is the first entry without the DLC, but it becomes second as the new one, "A Celebration of Wardens" is added before it. "Dirthamen: Keeper of Secrets" is listed as #11, but it is currently #13 in my game. Any ideas how we are going to resolve the issue? Asherinka (talk) 01:30, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
It'll be similar to the Origins and DA2 codex system, where you list the "vanilla" codex number (with no DLCs installed) and then follow it up with (+#DLC Name). For example, the Dirthamen codex would become 11 (+2JOK). --
Keladin Storm (Talk) 02:33, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
Exactly as Keladin says, though I would recommend either "JOH" or "JH" to use as the initials. Do we know if it's always +2? It'll be much easier to update all the codex entries if it is, rather than having to check them one-by-one. --♫ Kelcat Talk 02:43, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
No it's not. New entries are inserted in the alphabetical order, so it will be 1,2,3,4,5,6 and then 1,2 new,3(ex2),4(ex3),5 new,6(ex4),7(ex5),8 new,9(ex 6) etc. Asherinka (talk) 02:48, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
UPD One more question. There are a lot of DAI texts that are not included in the Codex. I recently added all landmark descriptions (like this). However some are not even landmarks (like this). What should we do with such items? Asherinka (talk) 07:49, April 11, 2015 (UTC)