Forum:Chat moderation - Isolationistmagi

Forums: Index > Wiki DiscussionChat moderation - Isolationistmagi

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4178 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not continue it unless it really needs a response.

I'd like to nominate IsolationistMagi as a chat moderator, due to a recent lack of moderators actively present when verbal discourses become a little chaotic. Please feel free to add your opinion to this nomination. Thanks! - 05:25, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support

I concur, no question. EzzyD (talk) 05:26, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I concur. After some of the problems we've been having over the last few nights, the chat is seriously in need of some more manpower. Hitokiri Akins (talk) 05:27, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

We could always use more chat mods and Iso is a great choice. Aleksandr the Great (talk) 05:28, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

why does this need discussion? he should have been one a long time ago Balmz (talk) 05:31, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I'm 100% with this nomination. 07:58, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Yes--Gutbuster66 (talk) 11:36, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

She has the votes of the Creators. The Dread Wolf

I don't frequent the chat, but based on her contributions and diligence in combating vandalism, I'm more than happy to support this King Cousland | Talk 16:32, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I concur -Algol- (talk) 16:47, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I concur. Lurooke Surana (talk) 16:47, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I concur.Jaeha (talk) 17:17, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I Concur. Phoenix96 (talk) 19:21, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

I don't use the chat, but I frequently see IsolationistMagi online, and based on her other wiki activity, I definitely regard her as a trusted and responsible member of the community. The nomination has my support.
──┤ │ Egan o gard │ talk ├── 23:36, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments, questions and discussion

why does this need discussion? he should have been one a long time ago Balmz (talk) 05:31, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

First off, "She". Second, it this NEEDS to be voted on to make it so. Hitokiri Akins (talk) 05:48, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

It's wiki policy- gives a chance for reasons and objections to the nomination to be presented, and to ensure that community support for the nomination is present. It's also useful for archival purposes. ----Isolationistmagi 06:50, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Wait... Wait... Let me get this one thing straight... Iso is a SHE??? O_o -Algol- (talk) 15:20, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Why so surprised? ;) Her name is gender-neutral. Can't just make assumptions about people you meet online Algol... Kestrella (talk) 16:27, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

1) Good to see you:) 2) My assumptions weren't because of the name, they were because of... other things. But I need a confirmation from the woman herself:) -Algol- (talk) 16:31, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

The importance of gender online confuses me a bit. But for what it's worth consider this confirmation. ----Isolationistmagi 16:37, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Gender online isn't really important for me, it was rather about me being convinced for a while, and then finding out the contrary. Next thing I know there is a Maker:) -Algol- (talk) 16:47, November 9, 2012 (UTC)