I would like to nominate HD3 for adminship. With almost 4,500 edits, he has proved to be a superb contributor and takes an active interest in the running of the wiki. His contributions have been consistently measured and sensible and he always engages in a diplomatic manner during discussions. From what I have observed, HD3 is also a popular member of the forums, and being able to engage with fellow users in this manner is always a positive for an admin.
The volume of work required on the wiki will no doubt balloon shortly with the impending release of Dragon Age: Inquisition, and I have no doubt that making HD3 an admin will be to the immense benefit of the wiki in the coming months and beyond. 
King Cousland | Talk 12:04, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Support
Per the above. King Cousland | Talk 12:04, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Most definitely, HD3 is always a pleasure to interact with in the forums and chat. --HorrorKnight (talk) 13:13, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Oh the Good King of Contributions is being offered Adminship? I'll just click the yes button. B.S.S.T. (talk) 13:18, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Don't see why not, he's made loads of great contributions and knows his stuff. Also have sometimes seen some people say things like: "Who do you think you are? You're not an admin!" when he fixes edits. This will shut them up. --Xsari (Talk) 15:33, October 12, 2014 (GMT)
I don't see why not. --MarkRulez711 (talk) 15:55, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Absolutely! HD3 has been a great asset to this wiki as an editor, and I have no doubt that HD3 would be a great asset as an admin. HD3 has always seemed to me fair and respectful when dealing with others, handles disputes well, and is very knowledgeable about the wiki and guidelines. --♫ Kelcat Talk 18:57, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
HD3's extensive knowledge of Dragon Age lore would probably make him a superb administrator. Caspoi (talk) 20:37, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
I second this. Supergodzilla118 22:03, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Can I vote "yes" a dozen times? No? Anyway, HD3 is a valuable member of the community and he would make a great admin. I wholeheartedly agree with everything King Cousland said. --Death by Cheese (talk) 22:42, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
RShepard227 (talk) 03:13, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
He's a nice guy... so yeah why not?--
14:11, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
I think he would make a great admin, and truely desevers this for all the hard work he has done. I hope you get it Bro!(Darion Cousland (talk) 17:15, October 13, 2014 (UTC))
I didn't think he would like the position based on conversations with him in the past, but if he's nominated, I presume he is interested in it after all. In which case, I absolutely support his nomination and I'm sure he'll make a great admin. --
18:00, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
– mostlyautumn • talk • contribs • 06:57, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
Long standing and dedicated editor, with a whole lot of good work under his belt! 
Loleil Talk 16:40, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
I know how he works and I have no doubts that he'd be a great addition to the team. 
13:19, October 18, 2014 (UTC)
I've given this a lot of thought and while I know that HD3 is an excellent editor, I had to think about whether or not he would make a good administrator. After talking with other admins and reading the responses here, I'm convinced that he would be an excellent admin. I trust that he will uphold the fair and open nature of our community as we welcome new users with the upcoming release. -- tierrie talk contr 23:40, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
Neutral
Neutral. EzzyD (talk) 02:54, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
Switzing this one. --
03:10, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments, questions and discussion
Are non-administrators allowed to vote? Caspoi (talk) 20:23, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
- The vote for Adminship affects everyone on the Wiki. The more votes the merrier. At leasts that's how I see it. B.S.S.T. (talk) 20:30, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
I dunno how balance of administration goes but I think that you guys should have a devil's advocate type of admin, someone that thinks of the worse cases and voices opinions that are not so popular.-- 20:25, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
I support him and his work around here, and have no doubt he would make a great admin. Buuuut I just got done nicknaming him "Seeker," and a promotion would require calling him "Lord Seeker" (and I hate Lambert), so I dunno... Bann Bullshit, any thoughts? Shall we call him Knight-Commander and change my vote? :) RShepard227 (talk) 00:08, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- If I may persuade you my good friend, I say we call him High Seeker, and if he becomes a bureaucrat we call him Lord Seeker. High Seeker HD3 has a much better ring don't you think? B.S.S.T. (talk) 02:42, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- I had completely forgotten about that rank. High Seeker it is! :D And with that, I switch my vote.
RShepard227 (talk) 03:13, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- I had completely forgotten about that rank. High Seeker it is! :D And with that, I switch my vote.
- May I just say I am actually quite close to being moved by the show of support here. I did not know anyone outside of maybe 4 other regular editors here actually remembered I existed in any capacity so this was quite appreciated.
-
10:25, October 20, 2014 (UTC)