User talk:Tierrie

{|class="wikitable" border="0" style="float:right; margin-left: 2em;" {|class="wikitable" width="100%" style="border: 1px; margin-left: 0; padding: 2px; border-spacing: 0; border-style: solid; background-color: #131313; border-color: #;"
 * align="right" colspan="2"|
 * class="FO3-infobox-title" style="font-size: 1em; padding: 0 0.5em 0 0.5em; line-height: 1em; border-color: #;"|

Archives

 * style="vertical-align:top; padding:0.2em 0.8em 0.5em 0.8em;"|
 * Archive 1
 * }
 * }
 * }

Re: Table of Contents
Hehe well I'm glad it meets your lofty standards! It's just a pity there's no way to see how badly you've mangled the sidebar until after you've hit the save button, and that a permanent record of my previous mistakes will be forever preserved in the page history, sigh. At least it looks like it's all up and running now, though I'm still paranoid there's a terribly obvious problem. Loleil 12:28, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Transparant icon.
For some reason items don't show the transparant silver and bronze icon. (See Faith's Edge.) I couldn't quickly see why, and I didn't want to mess with your work ;)--Mytharox 14:48, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Demons can possess corpses, so why not wiki pages. We'd better stay alert. On the bright side, it's just additional XP for each extra demon taken care off :P--Mytharox 19:32, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * On another note, the 100 times Wade discussion drives me crazy :P Every armor, every drake, dragon, walkthrough, area, location, npc involved the same.--Mytharox 19:33, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but the problem wasn't really the info, it was the discussion on almost every page about it, and people editing that specific info part. Having it 1 click further also creates 1 spot where people can share their thoughts at a central place.--Mytharox 19:57, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, I would rather have an include, but it's a bit complex. You wouldn't want a discussion about wade and the drake scale at the page Dragon Scale or the page High Dragon or Mountain Top as those pages just are mildly connected (and deal mainly about dragons and not about drakes). While Wade is connected to all of them and the process. There are really quite a few pages Special:WhatLinksHere/Wade that had discussions going on that really don't need all the info about the discussion and the process of every item he can make. Of course I am totally in for a cool solution, and I like includes, but I doubt includes would be handy for all of these pages.--Mytharox 20:10, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * It might not be the most elegant solution, but I hope it will ease the Wade discussion spam for the moment;) Wade isn't the only one that has this type of spam, I've seen it happen with other things like backpack and inventory too. But it was one of the worst:P--Mytharox 20:23, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added the info of the link you added, I'll just wait a bit and see if people will correct it, beautify it and then we could include it later I suppose.--Mytharox 20:46, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

regex
(?P {{[aA]rmor[tT]able[rR]ow)

(?P \|\[\[[\w\s]+\]\])(?P .+)

(?P \|.+)

(?P \|.+)

(?P \|.+)

(?P \|[\w\s]+)(?P [\S].+)

It's going to do something like that. Should be able to change it around a little bit for any other templates; the regex leaves a little to be desired (minor string funging afterwards), but that can either be done with string functions or I can tweak the regex later. Anyway ... - Pwr905 21:07, December 5, 2009 (UTC)